The federal nursing home staffing standard was repealed

In 2024 the federal government set a minimum staffing level for nursing homes for the first time. Courts vacated it, Congress blocked it, and CMS repealed it effective February 2, 2026. NursingHomeGrade still grades facilities against it. This page explains what the rule required, how it died, what actually applies now, and why we kept the benchmark.

What the 2024 rule required

The CMS final rule "Minimum Staffing Standards for Long-Term Care Facilities and Medicaid Institutional Payment Transparency Reporting," published May 2024, would have required every Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing facility to provide, at minimum:

The requirements were to phase in over three years for urban facilities and five years for rural facilities, with the total-hours and 24/7 RN provisions arriving before the individual RN and aide thresholds. Facilities could apply for hardship exemptions tied to local workforce availability. The rule also imposed a new, enforceable facility assessment process and required daily posting of actual staffing levels.

How it died

What federal law actually requires now

The reinstated standard is the one that governed nursing homes before 2024: a facility must have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, and must employ a full-time director of nursing. Both are subject to waiver where a facility can demonstrate it is unable to recruit staff and the state agency approves.

This is materially weaker than what was repealed, and not merely by degree. The 2024 rule scaled with the number of residents; the current rule does not scale at all. A 120-bed facility and a 30-bed facility satisfy it identically — one RN, one third of the day. For the 120-bed facility that works out to roughly 0.07 RN hours per resident per day if the RN works no other shift, against the 0.55 the repealed rule would have required. For the remaining 16 hours of the day, federal law requires no registered nurse in the building at all. The current requirement is a staffing floor for the facility, not a care standard for the resident.

What still applies

The repeal was not total. These obligations survive and remain enforceable:

Why we still grade against 0.55

CMS did not arrive at 0.55 RN hours arbitrarily. It came out of a commissioned staffing study and decades of research linking registered nurse hours to pressure ulcers, avoidable hospitalizations, infection rates, and mortality. The rule was struck down on questions of administrative authority and blocked on questions of cost and workforce supply. Nothing in the litigation, the statute, or the repeal notice found that residents need less nursing care than the evidence indicated. A staffing level does not stop being the level residents need because the agency that identified it lost the authority to require it. We report the current legal requirement honestly wherever we cite it, and we grade against the benchmark.

Sources: Federal Register, "Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Repeal of Minimum Staffing Standards for Long-Term Care Facilities" (published December 3, 2025); American Health Care Association v. Becerra, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas (decided April 2025); the multistate challenge decided by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa (June 2025); Public Law 119-21 (2025); 42 CFR 483.35.

How many facilities fall below 0.55 today

These figures are computed from the current CMS data in our database each time this page is requested. Facilities that do not report RN staffing hours are excluded from both the count and the denominator.

6,440 of 14,308 reporting nursing facilities nationally (45.0%) staff below 0.55 RN hours per resident per day — the level the repealed 2024 rule would have required.

State Below 0.55 hrs Facilities reporting Share
Alaska 0 16 0.0%
Alabama 74 221 33.5%
Arkansas 184 218 84.4%
Arizona 55 136 40.4%
California 653 1,130 57.8%
Colorado 43 203 21.2%
Connecticut 76 185 41.1%
District of Columbia 0 15 0.0%
Delaware 6 43 14.0%
Florida 249 679 36.7%
Georgia 223 343 65.0%
GU 0 1 0.0%
Hawaii 0 41 0.0%
Iowa 100 381 26.2%
Idaho 11 79 13.9%
Illinois 279 653 42.7%
Indiana 193 501 38.5%
Kansas 90 287 31.4%
Kentucky 75 260 28.8%
Louisiana 243 253 96.0%
Massachusetts 138 335 41.2%
Maryland 46 218 21.1%
Maine 2 78 2.6%
Michigan 117 416 28.1%
Minnesota 15 328 4.6%
Missouri 357 468 76.3%
Mississippi 93 197 47.2%
Montana 9 58 15.5%
North Carolina 230 404 56.9%
North Dakota 3 70 4.3%
Nebraska 66 170 38.8%
New Hampshire 8 73 11.0%
New Jersey 171 341 50.1%
New Mexico 31 66 47.0%
Nevada 16 63 25.4%
New York 265 584 45.4%
Ohio 372 908 41.0%
Oklahoma 237 259 91.5%
Oregon 45 125 36.0%
Pennsylvania 223 637 35.0%
PR 0 8 0.0%
Rhode Island 16 70 22.9%
South Carolina 102 184 55.4%
South Dakota 17 92 18.5%
Tennessee 158 302 52.3%
Texas 922 1,143 80.7%
Utah 3 90 3.3%
Virginia 148 283 52.3%
Vermont 5 32 15.6%
Washington 12 188 6.4%
Wisconsin 20 317 6.3%
West Virginia 33 121 27.3%
Wyoming 6 35 17.1%

Related

See which facilities staff below the benchmark, and how we build the grades.

Facilities below the benchmark → How we grade →