The federal nursing home staffing standard was repealed

In 2024 the federal government set a minimum staffing level for nursing homes for the first time. Courts vacated it, Congress blocked it, and CMS repealed it effective February 2, 2026. NursingHomeGrade still grades facilities against it. This page explains what the rule required, how it died, what actually applies now, and why we kept the benchmark.

What the 2024 rule required

The CMS final rule "Minimum Staffing Standards for Long-Term Care Facilities and Medicaid Institutional Payment Transparency Reporting," published May 2024, would have required every Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing facility to provide, at minimum:

The requirements were to phase in over three years for urban facilities and five years for rural facilities, with the total-hours and 24/7 RN provisions arriving before the individual RN and aide thresholds. Facilities could apply for hardship exemptions tied to local workforce availability. The rule also imposed a new, enforceable facility assessment process and required daily posting of actual staffing levels.

How it died

What federal law actually requires now

The reinstated standard is the one that governed nursing homes before 2024: a facility must have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, and must employ a full-time director of nursing. Both are subject to waiver where a facility can demonstrate it is unable to recruit staff and the state agency approves.

This is materially weaker than what was repealed, and not merely by degree. The 2024 rule scaled with the number of residents; the current rule does not scale at all. A 120-bed facility and a 30-bed facility satisfy it identically — one RN, one third of the day. For the 120-bed facility that works out to roughly 0.07 RN hours per resident per day if the RN works no other shift, against the 0.55 the repealed rule would have required. For the remaining 16 hours of the day, federal law requires no registered nurse in the building at all. The current requirement is a staffing floor for the facility, not a care standard for the resident.

What still applies

The repeal was not total. These obligations survive and remain enforceable:

Why we still grade against 0.55

CMS did not arrive at 0.55 RN hours arbitrarily. It came out of a commissioned staffing study and decades of research linking registered nurse hours to pressure ulcers, avoidable hospitalizations, infection rates, and mortality. The rule was struck down on questions of administrative authority and blocked on questions of cost and workforce supply. Nothing in the litigation, the statute, or the repeal notice found that residents need less nursing care than the evidence indicated. A staffing level does not stop being the level residents need because the agency that identified it lost the authority to require it. We report the current legal requirement honestly wherever we cite it, and we grade against the benchmark.

Sources: Federal Register, "Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Repeal of Minimum Staffing Standards for Long-Term Care Facilities" (published December 3, 2025); American Health Care Association v. Becerra, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas (decided April 2025); the multistate challenge decided by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa (June 2025); Public Law 119-21 (2025); 42 CFR 483.35.

How many facilities fall below 0.55 today

These figures are computed from the current CMS data in our database each time this page is requested. Facilities that do not report RN staffing hours are excluded from both the count and the denominator.

6,495 of 14,174 reporting nursing facilities nationally (45.8%) staff below 0.55 RN hours per resident per day — the level the repealed 2024 rule would have required.

State Below 0.55 hrs Facilities reporting Share
Alaska 0 20 0.0%
Alabama 81 221 36.7%
Arkansas 177 209 84.7%
Arizona 52 136 38.2%
California 679 1,124 60.4%
Colorado 38 201 18.9%
Connecticut 77 187 41.2%
District of Columbia 0 16 0.0%
Delaware 4 44 9.1%
Florida 235 668 35.2%
Georgia 231 347 66.6%
GU 0 1 0.0%
Hawaii 1 41 2.4%
Iowa 106 367 28.9%
Idaho 14 75 18.7%
Illinois 268 649 41.3%
Indiana 203 492 41.3%
Kansas 95 286 33.2%
Kentucky 96 262 36.6%
Louisiana 238 249 95.6%
Massachusetts 139 333 41.7%
Maryland 41 216 19.0%
Maine 3 74 4.1%
Michigan 120 408 29.4%
Minnesota 21 321 6.5%
Missouri 358 468 76.5%
Mississippi 89 198 44.9%
Montana 8 58 13.8%
North Carolina 227 399 56.9%
North Dakota 2 72 2.8%
Nebraska 54 171 31.6%
New Hampshire 12 67 17.9%
New Jersey 152 338 45.0%
New Mexico 34 66 51.5%
Nevada 16 63 25.4%
New York 283 582 48.6%
Ohio 387 904 42.8%
Oklahoma 232 258 89.9%
Oregon 51 122 41.8%
Pennsylvania 219 633 34.6%
PR 0 7 0.0%
Rhode Island 14 69 20.3%
South Carolina 100 178 56.2%
South Dakota 15 93 16.1%
Tennessee 158 298 53.0%
Texas 906 1,120 80.9%
Utah 8 96 8.3%
Virginia 153 283 54.1%
Vermont 5 32 15.6%
Washington 24 184 13.0%
Wisconsin 29 315 9.2%
West Virginia 39 121 32.2%
Wyoming 1 32 3.1%

Related

See which facilities staff below the benchmark, and how we build the grades.

Facilities below the benchmark → How we grade →